| Alte Public Foren • cigarettes outlets online Are doctors making us fa |
| 14.01.2014, 03:22 - usacigarettes - Gefreiter - 11 Posts Are doctors making us fat What makes us fat? According to Ontario doctors the culprits are junk food and sugary drinks. That why last month the Ontario Medical Association issued a list of policy recommendations that would treat junk foods on the same level as poisons. The OMA report not only calls for higher taxes and marketing cigarettes outlets online restrictions, but graphic warnings of the kind we see on cigarette packages. In fact, the lessons from tobacco inspired the recommendations of the OMA. In other words, unless we take drastic action, the OMA warns, this generation of kids will live shorter lives than their parents. A frightening prospect. But will these recommendations work? And what really driving the obesity crisis in Canada? As much as the OMA hates to hear it, the causes of obesity are much more complicated than its report dares to admit. If Mike Gibney, professor of Food and Health at University College at Dublin, is right that if heart disease has a complexity of one, cancer a complexity of 10, and obesity has a complexity of 100, no one food can be blamed for rising obesity. The OMA report also gives the impression that obesity started in the last 30 years, but we know from the research of historian John Komolos that North Americans have been steadily gaining weight since the 1920s. This is further evidence that blaming junk foods or sugary drinks for the rise in weight over cheap marlboro cigarettes time is too simplistic. In light of those two factors, the OMA shame and blame policies don have a chance against the myriad causes of obesity. And it also far from clear that taxes would do much good. In a recent Cornell University study on the impact of taxes on soft drink consumption, the researchers found that taxes don hold out much hope of lowering obesity. In a controlled newport cigarettes experiment where half the households faced a 10 per cent tax on soda consumption and the other half did not, the tax discouraged consumption only for the first month with little change thereafter. What the experiment did show is that beer consumption increased for those facing higher soda taxes. The OMA second false argument is that if taxes and restrictions worked for tobacco, we can apply those lessons to sugar and other fats. surgeon general warning and decades before we started seeing cancer-ridden images on cigarette packages. There is no food or drink that can claim the same straight-line relationship between consumption and obesity. Too often we conflate junk food and Big Tobacco as if they were the same thing. In a paper published last June in the Canadian Medical Association Journal, the researchers state that overweight patients are more likely to lose weight when their doctor advises them, but too few patients with weight problem get the help they need. Why? Physicians claim they lack the time, resources and knowledge to help. And 45 per cent of clinicians said they didn feel qualified to treat obesity. The study further stated that per cent of primary care physicians surveyed said that no one in their practice was trained to deal with weight-related issues. Clinicians are the first line of defence against the health dangers of obesity, especially among children. We need them to provide the best possible care when it comes to fighting obesity by monitoring and advising their patients on weight control. If our Ontario doctors aren doing their job in helping their patients lose weight, they shouldn turn to politicians to implement unproven policies to compel the rest of us to lose weight. |